
News Home
Latest Press Release
Latest News Log
“Validate before you Buy”
By Shawn Ennis - 6/13/2005
OpenWater recently ran into a situation
that, unfortunately, is becoming an all
too common occurrence. The customer had
a need to manage their optical infrastructure.
After doing some research on the internet
they determined who the major players
are. Based upon reading vendor marketing
materials and meeting with the various
business development teams they were able
to determine the solution that they wanted
to proceed forward with. Now if you’ve
been through the trenches in this industry,
then you may understand that vendor marketing
documents and business development personnel
are not necessarily solely motivated to
help you solve your problems. It might
even be fair to say that they are strongly
driven to accomplish one major objective
– reaching their quota.
Now all through this process the customer
never engaged with a services company.
They never talked to anyone who had deployed
the software before. They never engaged
an objective third party to validate the
vendors claims. They never stopped for
a minute to consider that the following
statement from the software vendor might
not have been entirely accurate, “if
you just buy our software, then you will
find that it solves all of your problems.”
Many organizations still like to believe
that there is a magic software pill out
there that you can swallow to cure what
ails you.
Nothing can replace the diligence and
discovery of going through a requirements
analysis, developing a selection criteria,
and completing a vendor comparison matrix.
All of this was placed on the back burner
to accommodate a perceived time savings
in the project by reducing the transaction
speed on the front end. One step forward
and two steps back is clearly not what
this customer was shooting for; yet this
is a frequent occurrence in the world
of Enterprise Technology Management (ETM).
Have we all forgotten the lessons of CA
and Metasolv?
So how did we get
involved? OpenWater was engaged after
the software was purchased to implement
the solution that the software manufacturer
and the customer developed together. On
our first week on the project we quickly
came to the realization that the sold
software will not work in the customer’s
environment. The software did not support
the hardware type and firmware version
running in production at the clients’
organization.
A project that was
supposed to be completed in three weeks
will now take three months to hopefully
complete. The customer is now reeling.
How could this have happened? Why did
we not know? New software is always tempting,
but it typically hasn’t been put
through the paces yet. How stable is it?
What is the depth of platform support?
It is always best to have an advocate
with real-world knowledge, experience
and connections to get the right solution
that delivers the greatest value with
the least amount of risk possible.
All of this could have been easily mitigated
if the customer would have engaged a qualified
services organization to assist or help
them validate their decision. Budget is
too much a valuable commodity to make
this mistake.
|